现在有rfc jinx hk /rfc jp / rfc sg 这都是T1, 我到底是用po0去拉的,还是用vless直连?
lev1ne08-28 10:02
6楼
@millionfor #5 发布于2026/8/28 10:01:46
@lev1ne #4
现在有rfc jinx hk /rfc jp / rfc sg 这都是T1, 我到底是用po0去拉的,还是用vless直连?
直接JINX HK就行。但你前提得保证好你本地到JINX HK的网络不拥堵、不丢包。
millionfor楼主08-28 10:05
7楼
@lev1ne #6
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=354.294 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=357.317 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=353.588 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=354.847 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=374.689 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=379.193 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=357.321 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=354.062 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=353.103 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=354.354 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=10 ttl=48 time=357.202 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=11 ttl=48 time=353.925 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=12 ttl=48 time=355.660 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=13 ttl=48 time=357.720 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=14 ttl=48 time=353.663 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=15 ttl=48 time=357.273 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=16 ttl=48 time=354.399 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=17 ttl=48 time=353.772 ms
稳定350 但就是延迟太高了,是这么ping么 还是如何测这个
lev1ne08-28 10:08
8楼
@millionfor #7 发布于2026/8/28 10:05:52
@lev1ne #6
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=354.294 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=357.317 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=353.588 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=354.847 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=374.689 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=379.193 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=357.321 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=354.062 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=353.103 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=354.354 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=10 ttl=48 time=357.202 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=11 ttl=48 time=353.925 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=12 ttl=48 time=355.660 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=13 ttl=48 time=357.720 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=14 ttl=48 time=353.663 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=15 ttl=48 time=357.273 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=16 ttl=48 time=354.399 ms
64 bytes from 172.81.222.225: icmp_seq=17 ttl=48 time=353.772 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=40.330 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=40.851 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=40.747 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=41.747 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=39.445 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=39.517 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=39.541 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=7 ttl=49 time=40.248 ms
找了台奶爸,口子大点,要如何测这个tg速度上来了 ,目前用来没明显提升
lev1ne08-28 10:17
10楼
@millionfor #9 发布于2026/8/28 10:16:04
@lev1ne #8 rfc直连就这样,但是配合po0就延迟很低,但是就是口子限制了200M。
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=40.330 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=40.851 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=40.747 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=41.747 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=39.445 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=39.517 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=39.541 ms
64 bytes from 74.52.12.208: icmp_seq=7 ttl=49 time=40.248 ms